
Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs
Posted:
May 17, 2013 10:42 AM


In article <0545f14ded7c48a1896ab80337a0a9d0@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> wrote:
>> That makes the headline misleading because we already knew there were >> infinitely many pairs of successive primes.
>Not with a finitely bounded gap between them we didn't.
Yes, that's why the headline is wrong  it doesn't say that.
 Richard

