Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 263
Replies: 3   Last Post: May 23, 2013 6:42 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Alan Smaill Posts: 1,103 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 263
Posted: May 17, 2013 6:21 PM

Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> writes:

> On May 17, 7:46 pm, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Yes, every post you make errors regarding Cantor's formula.
>>
>> > It's a real maze to get one sensible comment out of you.
>>
>> > You infer all sorts of facts given the example f
>> > then say nothing can be inferred at all from a partial f.

>>
>> > Why would S change its value of 2eS
>>
>> > given f(2) but not f(100) ?
>>
>> Here's a game:
>>
>> * you give me a way of determining the nth digit of the mth number
>>   in a list of reals given in decimal;
>> * I give you back a way of determining the digits of a real in decimal;
>> * you tell me where that number is in your given list --
>>   you win if it is where you claim, and lose otherwise.
>>
>> Do you want to play?
>>

>
> If you allow a hypothetical Halt function then OK

No, you need to start by giving an effective way of computing
the nth digit of the mth real.

Do you want to play?

> Herc
>

--
Alan Smaill

Date Subject Author
5/17/13 Alan Smaill
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/23/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de