Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 263
Replies: 57   Last Post: May 17, 2013 8:52 PM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 263
Posted: May 17, 2013 8:47 PM
 Plain Text Reply

In article
<38a76ce0-667e-4617-80a2-a8ab35decf0b@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 18, 10:34 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <ca34a387-11e5-477f-9115-f5a1ce2fd...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > > Cantors does not say that there is no more than one such set, he just
> > > > said that there is at least one, and I have provided at least one, in
> > > > fact uncountably many of them.

> >
> > > I want to see the FORMULA
> >
> > > { n | n ~e f(n) }
> >
> > > WORK ON
> >
> > >   f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
> > >   f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
> > >   f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 }
> > >   f(4) = { 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 }

> >
> > >   f(n) = N | n>4
> >
> > > ALL VALUES OF f() ARE SPECIFIED.
> >
> > > ----------
> >
> > > Does your favorite Cantors formula
> >
> > It is not my formula at all, but Cantor's
> >
> >
> >

> > > S = { n | n ~e f(n) }
> >
> > > WORK on the GIVEN f ?
> >
> > > If it does - WHAT IS S ?
>
> For the given f, ask yourself:
>
> Is 1 in f(1)? YES
> Is 2 in f(2)? NO
> Is 3 in f(3)? NO
> Is 4 in f(4)? YES
> Is n in f(n) for n > 4? YES to ALL
>

> > And then work out which will be in { n in |N : ~ n in f(n) }.
>
>
>
> I get S = { 2 , 3 }
>
> S = { x | x ~e f(x) }
>
>   f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
>   f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
>   f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 }
>   f(4) = { 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 }
>   f(n) = N | n>4
>
>
> You took 5 days and still couldn't calculate Cantors Missing Set.

Actually I posted that set long ago, but you were to dumb to realize
what it was.
--

Date Subject Author
5/10/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Graham Cooper
5/13/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Graham Cooper
5/13/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Scott Berg
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.