Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology � 263
Replies: 57   Last Post: May 17, 2013 8:52 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,344
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: Matheology § 263
Posted: May 17, 2013 8:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On May 18, 10:47 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <38a76ce0-667e-4617-80a2-a8ab35dec...@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
>  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On May 18, 10:34 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <ca34a387-11e5-477f-9115-f5a1ce2fd...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > > > Cantors does not say that there is no more than one such set, he just
> > > > > said that there is at least one, and I have provided at least one, in
> > > > > fact uncountably many of them.

>
> > > > I want to see the FORMULA
>
> > > > { n | n ~e f(n) }
>
> > > > WORK ON
>
> > > >   f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
> > > >   f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
> > > >   f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 }
> > > >   f(4) = { 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 }

>
> > > >   f(n) = N | n>4
>
> > > > ALL VALUES OF f() ARE SPECIFIED.
>
> > > > ----------
>
> > > > Does your favorite Cantors formula
>
> > > It is not my formula at all, but Cantor's
>
> > > > S = { n | n ~e f(n) }
>
> > > > WORK on the GIVEN f ?
>
> > > > If it does - WHAT IS S ?
>
> >  For the given f, ask yourself:
>
> >  Is 1 in f(1)?      YES
> >  Is 2 in f(2)?      NO
> >  Is 3 in f(3)?      NO
> >  Is 4 in f(4)?      YES
> >  Is n in f(n) for n > 4?      YES to ALL

>
> > >  And then work out which will be in { n in |N : ~ n in f(n) }.
>
> > I get  S = { 2 , 3 }
>
> > S = { x | x ~e f(x) }
>
> >    f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
> >    f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
> >    f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 }
> >    f(4) = { 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 }
> >    f(n) = N | n>4

>
> > You took 5 days and still couldn't calculate Cantors Missing Set.
>
> Actually I posted that set long ago, but you were to dumb to realize
> what it was.
>



[VIRGIL]

If you only give me

   f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
   f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
   f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6, 8 , 10 , ... }
   f(4) = { 4 , 5, 6, 7, 8 }

All I know so far is that that your f cannot be such a function
because 1 is in f(1) and 4 is in f(4).

---------------

NOPE! You posted WRONG and IRRELEVANT RUBBISH!

Herc


Date Subject Author
5/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Scott Berg
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.