The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Grothendieck universe
Replies: 5   Last Post: May 22, 2013 5:41 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Grothendieck universe
Posted: May 21, 2013 8:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 5/21/2013 3:51 AM, William Elliot wrote:
> A Grothendieck universe is a set G of ZFG with the axioms:
> for all A in G, B in A, B in G,
> for all A,B in G, { A,B } in G,
> for all A in G, P(A) in G,
> I in G, for all j in I, Aj in G implies \/{ Aj | j in I } in G.

... and closure under unions, right? See FOM post listed
at bottom.

> The following are theorem of G:
> for all A in G, {A} in G,
> for all B in G, if A subset B then A in G,
> for all A in G, A /\ B, A / B in G,
> for all A,B in G, (A,B) = { {A,B}, {B} } in G.
> Are the following theorems or need they be axioms?
> If theorems, what would be a proof?

As always, I am a little out of practice...

> For all A,B in G, AxB = { (a,b) | a in A, b in B } in G.

Are not Cartesian products sometimes explained
as subsets of P(P(A \/ B))?

> I in G, for all j in I, Aj in G implies prod_j Aj in G.

Along the same lines, wouldn't this involve
an application of replacement to form the {A_i|i in I}
Then prod_j A_j would be a subset of P(P(\/{A_i|i in I}))

> For all A in G, |A| < |G|.

Wouldn't the closure axiom on power sets make this

Closure under power sets. Elements of an element
is an element. So, if any element were equipollent
with the universe, the universe would have the
cardinal of its own power set. Right?

> Is there any not empty Grothendieck universes.

...any favorite set theory

There are two simple universes discussed (empty set
and V_omega). The rest are associated with the
existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals.

You might find this to be of interest,

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.