The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Richard Dawkins Claims Unborn Children Are Less Human Then Pigs
Replies: 10   Last Post: May 24, 2013 4:05 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 221
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Richard Dawkins Claims Unborn Children Are Less Human Then Pigs
Posted: May 23, 2013 12:30 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:57:17 -0400, Brother Love wrote:

> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <>
> wrote:

>>On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <> wrote:
>>> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>>> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.

>>He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
>>their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are intelligent,
>>conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are *not*. The nervous
>>system isn't hooked up and operating until birth, for very good reason:
>>birth hurts.

> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I! Yes! Each and every one of
> you!

That's pretty much how I feel about people who have to lie to make their
point. You call Dawkins' description of God "unflattering". Dawkins is
quoting the Bible; he didn't write it, he's only reading it. Which,
apparently, many Christians fail to do.

Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.