On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:55:27 AM UTC-7, Kevin wrote: > If my left eye is a lever that controls the motion of my head then I > > get knot theory... Knot theory gives me the Sun referance
Reference,you stupid f*ck. If you want to continue pretending you're brilliant --learn how to spell basic words.
Or, even better, go somewhere else where you can fool someone into believing you're anything other than a worthless f*ck.
and feedback > > loops... Feedback loops can take a seemingly random cycle and proves > > that there is a pattern to what was thought to be a seemingly random > > cycle but that much is lost if it was ever important to begin with. So > > what is significant? Well, my left eye is what maintains focus but > > isn't that counterintuitive given right eye dominance? Well, my right > > eye doesn't concern itself with inversions of a sphere or entanglement > > between two inputs from the same source. If my eyesight gets > > progressively more nearsighted over the course of time then it is > > because my lazy right eye maintains a consistant lack of focus. > > Conjecture or hypothesis: What is the cure for progressive near > > sightedness? Right eye dominance is the cause of progressive near > > sightedness. Entanglement leads to degaussification. If I wake up in > > the morning and I open my eyes and my eyes are crossed then right eye > > dominance doesn't clarify the issue by maintaining focus but rather by > > maintaining a consistant lack of focus instead... Maybe Aerospace > > Engineering should have its back door in 'scanning' rather than > > 'tunneling'.