"fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message news:_-2dnT_Ah67vJTvMnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@giganews.com... > On 5/29/2013 7:13 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: <snipped>
> I almost forgot that I put these > in the thread. Assuming this is > to what you had been referring, > I have taken the time to find the > hypertext links.
Yes, and thanks very much, you are awesome.
> I am not trying to "purport" a logical > system as much as I am trying to > represent an analysis of it.
I can parse what you write, but the technical relevance is quite above my head. Spare thoughts: by looking at your tables, you've made me think back to a prototype logical calculator I have concocted together last year: I could get all logical connectives on some basic lattice from one single primitive, but to get any arithmetic at all I had to start fixing points on the lattice.
> However you come to view these posts, please > try to keep in mind that it is hard to see > things differently from others. And, since > I received no inquiries, there is little to > no explanation.
As an outsider to that specific research, I'd surely benefit from an explicit problem statement: namely, "what was that for?" would be the first question. In fact, I won't insist for more explanations: if you keep posting, I'll keep learning...