Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 275
Replies: 7   Last Post: Jun 4, 2013 1:45 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 1,694
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 275
Posted: May 31, 2013 2:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:c6dcf9d4-0bc6-48fd-8b83-e2c3d240ce92@h5g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
Matheology § 275

<snip crap>

>Yes, set theorists try to avoid that term in order to remain
>attractive to sober minds - but set theory needs actual or completed
>or, why not put it frankly, finished infinity and uses it heavily.
>
>Regards, WM



does
finished infinity = finished infinity +1 ?
0 = 1 / (finished infinity) ?

finished infinity = unfinished infinity + k where k is a constant ?





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.