The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 275
Replies: 7   Last Post: Jun 4, 2013 1:45 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,111
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 275
Posted: May 31, 2013 2:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"WM" <> wrote in message
Matheology § 275

<snip crap>

>Yes, set theorists try to avoid that term in order to remain
>attractive to sober minds - but set theory needs actual or completed
>or, why not put it frankly, finished infinity and uses it heavily.
>Regards, WM

finished infinity = finished infinity +1 ?
0 = 1 / (finished infinity) ?

finished infinity = unfinished infinity + k where k is a constant ?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.