Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 14, 2013 1:58 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tom Potter

Posts: 497
Registered: 8/9/06
Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Posted: Jun 8, 2013 10:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"Absolutely Vertical" <absolutelyvertical@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kosldo$i9u$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 6/6/2013 10:48 PM, Tom Potter wrote:
>> "Absolutely Vertical" <absolutelyvertical@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:koq8oa$7s3$1@speranza.aioe.org...

>>> On 6/6/2013 9:56 AM, Tom Potter wrote:
>>>> Do you think that people
>>>> should get a reasonable rate of return
>>>> for the time, mind and money
>>>> they expend acquiring information about a "tool".

>>>
>>> as far as i know, fundamental science research is not done for the sake
>>> of
>>> a 'reasonable rate of return'. why do you think it should be?

>>
>> What other social functions do you think
>> should operate carte blanche
>> other than war and fundamental science reseach?

>
> none of them should operate carte blanche. it's just that the measurable
> objectives of those activities are not practical applications in near
> term. they have _different_ measures of success.
>
> the objective of defense and war is the security of the people of a
> nation.
> the objective of fundamental research is the advancement of knowledge for
> its own sake.
> the objective of support of the arts out of public funds is the
> intellectual and esthetic health of the people.
> the objective of support of public parks and protected lands is the
> preservation of natural, undeveloped, unexploited resources for their own
> sake.
> the objective of space exploration is simply that: exploration.
> the objective of support of emergency assistance for the least, the last,
> and the lost is purely social altruism and expression of moral code.
>
> none of these objectives have to do with practical applications in the
> near term, but are considered just as valuable -- by the majority.


An examination of history clearly shows
that government leaders and government operatives

take advantage of transient "objectives"
and create long-lived, cancerous systems

that they use to obtain and maintain power, wealth, security,
and immunity from their errors, omissions, abuses and crimes.

Many wars have been waged,
most for booty and ego,

and very few for the security of the people.

Witness the recent war against the Iraqi people
that destabilized the Middle East,
and put America into moral and economic freefall.

I suggest that INDIVIDUALS and groups
should not be able use governments to FORCE other folks
to diminish their resources so they can
pursuit "knowledge for its own sake".


If an INDIVIDUAL and group
wants to pursuit "knowledge for its own sake"
they should have to do it with their own resources.

A better system is needed than allowing
special interest groups get Congressmen elected
that will FORCE folks to fund the life styles
and pursuit of "knowledge for its own sake"
by special interest groups.

I dare say that the people who use OPM
< Other people's money>
to pursuit "knowledge for its own sake"

consume more and generate less,
have more leisure time and security, etc.
than migrant workers, factory and retail workers, etc.
that are FORCED by government to pay the bill.

--
Tom Potter

http://the-cloud-machine.tk
http://tiny.im/390k
















Date Subject Author
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Sam Wormley
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/7/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Absolutely Vertical
6/8/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/10/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Absolutely Vertical
6/11/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/12/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Graham Cooper
6/12/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Absolutely Vertical
6/12/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Sam Wormley
6/9/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Golshifteh Farahani
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Golshifteh Farahani
6/6/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/7/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Absolutely Vertical
6/7/13
Read tivirelaty
Brian Q. Hutchings
6/8/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/9/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
6/10/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Absolutely Vertical
6/12/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Brian Q. Hutchings
6/9/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Golshifteh Farahani
6/7/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Norbert_Paul
6/8/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tom Potter
6/9/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
6/10/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Brian Q. Hutchings
6/14/13
Read Re: Unbeatable Relativity or Paradigm Shift
Tucsondrew@me.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.