Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Can we count N ?!
Replies: 5   Last Post: Jun 10, 2013 12:06 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,206
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Can we count N ?!
Posted: Jun 10, 2013 12:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:16674288-b8f7-48a9-a4a1-6320bf18fe47@googlegroups.com...
> On Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:38:52 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote in message
>> news:kp1hkg$8r8$1@dont-email.me...
>>

>> > By the same token, the sequence of subsets of N shown initially
>> > captures
>> > *all* subsets of N, finite and (potentially) infinite.

>>
>> > Bottom line, within the potentially infinite, P(N) is countable.
>>
>> I retract this conclusion as such, which is bogus in light of the
>> definition
>> of countability: at the moment I see no way out of the fact that counting
>> the power-set is a super-task, i.e. that we get into the non-standard,
>> and
>> this is because we need to count terminal nodes of the infinite binary
>> tree
>> to actually count the infinite sets. But the contention that a theory of
>> infinite sets cannot have potentially infinite sets rather becomes the
>> contention that, in a coherent theory of potentially infinite sets, the
>> power set of a set would only have the set's finite subsets as
>> embers. --
>> Are there set theories with this kind of limited power-set definition?

>
> Yes, there are, for example the null axiom set theory with powerset as
> order
> type as successor in ubiquitous ordinals.


Thanks for the kick-start. Browsing browsing, I've got to KPU, Goedel's
constructible universe, the axiom of constructibility, etc. Deemed as
"unnecessarily restrictive" by a standard that promotes incompleteness and
paradoxes. I'll also investigate further the surreal number system.

Julio





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.