"Nasser M. Abbasi" schrieb: > > Fyi, I also added FriCAS results to the table. I used 1.2, build it > from the source tar file on linux, used sbcl lisp installation. > > It was fast, even on a VBox. First time I used it. So I hope I > did not make any errors. Updated the page : > > http://www.12000.org/my_notes/ten_hard_integrals/index.htm > > The score now stands like this: > > 1. Mathematica: did 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10 did not: 5 > 2. Maple: did 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 did not: 9,10 > 3. Rubi4: did 2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 did not: 1,3 > 4. Sage: did: 1,2,3,4,7,9 did not: 5,6,8,10 > 5. Fricas: did 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10 did not: 5,8,9 > > If you spot any error, please let me know and will correct it. >
For FriCAS you have listed problem #5 as both "did" and "did not".
It would be informative if you could signal non-elementary answers by putting the corresponding problem numbers in parentheses, say.