In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> Matheology § 285 > > In this article, I argue that it is impossible to complete infinitely many > tasks in a finite time. A key premise in my argument is that the only way to > get to 0 tasks remaining is from 1 task remaining, when tasks are done > 1-by-1. I suggest that the only way to deny this premise is by begging the > question, that is, by assuming that supertasks are possible.
If each of a sequence of tasks takes no more than half the time of the previous task, infinitely many of them can take place in finite time.
If this were not so then motion would be impossible. --