Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Sound, semantically complete, categorical theory of arithmetic
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jun 13, 2013 8:24 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,348
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: Sound, semantically complete, categorical theory of arithmetic
Posted: Jun 11, 2013 3:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
> >>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival  wrote:
> >>>> I think I am an Elephant,
> >>>> Behind another Elephant
> >>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there....
> >>>>                                   A.A. Milne

>
> >>>        http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png
>
> >> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him?  Given your abject
> >> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show
> >> good faith.  If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on
> >> a good week.

>
> > Didn't you follow misc.legal?
>
> > Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that
> > I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be
> > paypaled $1000 up front by him!

>
> >https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
> > BRAD
> > More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
> > Word One
> > page 106 line 27

>
> > *************
> >https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
> > HERC
> > More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
> > What?
> > You can paypal up front if you want
> > Herc

>
> > Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues
> > during a mindreading test we could have completed it!

>
> You're changing the story *again*?  Surely you jest.  You offered a bet
> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't
> back out once it began.  Brad accepted that bet.  You then tried some
> sort of side bet, which he rejected.  You acted as if that meant he'd
> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear
> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test.  You then proceeded
> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in
> force.  Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly
> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about
> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a
> tantrum and quit.  You owe Brad $1000.  You know it, I know it, everyone
> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it.  Nobody *really*
> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't
> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a
> fraud.  You have no honor.  Nobody trusts you.


Here are the relevant threads.



> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
> BRAD
> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
> Word One
> page 106 line 27
> *************
> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
> HERC
> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
> What?
> You can paypal up front if you want
> Herc





Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar.


Herc





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.