On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: >> >>>>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival wrote: >>>>>> I think I am an Elephant, >>>>>> Behind another Elephant >>>>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there.... >>>>>> A.A. Milne >> >>>>> http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png >> >>>> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him? Given your abject >>>> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show >>>> good faith. If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on >>>> a good week. >> >>> Didn't you follow misc.legal? >> >>> Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that >>> I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be >>> paypaled $1000 up front by him! >> >>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298 >>> BRAD >>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm >>> Word One >>> page 106 line 27 >> >>> ************* >>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41 >>> HERC >>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm >>> What? >>> You can paypal up front if you want >>> Herc >> >>> Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues >>> during a mindreading test we could have completed it! >> >> You're changing the story *again*? Surely you jest. You offered a bet >> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't >> back out once it began. Brad accepted that bet. You then tried some >> sort of side bet, which he rejected. You acted as if that meant he'd >> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear >> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test. You then proceeded >> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in >> force. Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly >> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about >> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a >> tantrum and quit. You owe Brad $1000. You know it, I know it, everyone >> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it. Nobody *really* >> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't >> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a >> fraud. You have no honor. Nobody trusts you. > > Here are the relevant threads. > > > >> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298 >> BRAD >> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm >> Word One >> page 106 line 27 >> ************* >> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41 >> HERC >> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm >> What? >> You can paypal up front if you want >> Herc
Oh yeah, just keep spinning and spinning. You're not fooling anyone, you know.
> Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar.
I realize that you have some strange fantasies, but I don't even know what you mean by this one. You should keep your sexual habits to yourself. In fact, I wonder if you're an Aries. This week's horoscope for Aries (from America's Finest News Source, the best source for horoscopes) seems particularly apt: "Sometimes in life, you just need to stop whatever it is you're doing and take a step back. Actually, maybe it's two steps back. Yeah, that's good. Keep going. The stars will let you know when you're far enough."