On Jun 12, 7:38 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > >>> On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > >>>>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival wrote: > >>>>>> I think I am an Elephant, > >>>>>> Behind another Elephant > >>>>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there.... > >>>>>> A.A. Milne > > >>>>> http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png > > >>>> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him? Given your abject > >>>> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show > >>>> good faith. If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on > >>>> a good week. > > >>> Didn't you follow misc.legal? > > >>> Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that > >>> I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be > >>> paypaled $1000 up front by him! > > >>>https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298 > >>> BRAD > >>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm > >>> Word One > >>> page 106 line 27 > > >>> ************* > >>>https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41 > >>> HERC > >>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm > >>> What? > >>> You can paypal up front if you want > >>> Herc > > >>> Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues > >>> during a mindreading test we could have completed it! > > >> You're changing the story *again*? Surely you jest. You offered a bet > >> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't > >> back out once it began. Brad accepted that bet. You then tried some > >> sort of side bet, which he rejected. You acted as if that meant he'd > >> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear > >> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test. You then proceeded > >> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in > >> force. Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly > >> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about > >> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a > >> tantrum and quit. You owe Brad $1000. You know it, I know it, everyone > >> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it. Nobody *really* > >> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't > >> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a > >> fraud. You have no honor. Nobody trusts you. > > > Here are the relevant threads. > > >>https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298 > >> BRAD > >> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm > >> Word One > >> page 106 line 27 > >> ************* > >>https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41 > >> HERC > >> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm > >> What? > >> You can paypal up front if you want > >> Herc > > Oh yeah, just keep spinning and spinning. You're not fooling anyone, > you know. > > > Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar. > > I realize that you have some strange fantasies, but I don't even know > what you mean by this one. You should keep your sexual habits to > yourself. In fact, I wonder if you're an Aries. This week's horoscope > for Aries (from America's Finest News Source, the best source for > horoscopes) seems particularly apt: > "Sometimes in life, you just need to stop whatever it is you're doing > and take a step back. Actually, maybe it's two steps back. Yeah, that's > good. Keep going. The stars will let you know when you're far enough." >
The number 1 symptom of denial is citation blindness.