dpb <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message <email@example.com>... > On 6/11/2013 5:30 PM, Wanderson wrote: > ... > > > I am wondering if we haven't another way to do that. > > I need to run my program several times and using this method my code is > > much slower than before. But thanks anyway, it's exactly what I needed. > > Sometimes even in ML straightforward is quicker! :) > > While it is a builtin function, it creates temporary of size of the > matrices to match and then also the indirect function reference may play > a small part as well. > > If you need speed, the straight-ahead loop is probably as good as you're > going to do w/o a specialized mex function. (I believe there may be > some submissions on File Exchange that do, in fact, promise better > performance than bsxfun iirc) > > --
hehe, my problem is that I am doing a program that evaluates some double integrals, calculate FFT and whanever, but I have a NECESSARY big 'FOR LOOP' inside my program to store each value of these integrals in the right place. And I didn't want to use another loop inside my huge loop rsrsrs.