In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 21:22:40 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > > > You right, no difference. Both fail at the limit stage. > > Like the enumeration of all rational numbers.
Wrong! Many successful enumerations of the rationals exist > > Note: There is no limit stage in set theory, although omega is *called* a > limit ordinal.
There are all sorts of limits in the forms of set theory that exist outside of WMytheology.
E.g., for an increasing sequence of sets, each a subset of its successor, the limit is the union. And for a decreasing sequence, with each successor set a subset of its predecessor, the limit is the intersection. --