In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> Formal proofs based upon nonsense axioms are not acceptable, since I just > disprove this nonsense formalism and the axioms which it is based upon. > > Regards, WM
Name one where it succeeds!
In Wolkenmuekenheim, your list of lines has a last line, but outside of Wolkenmuekenheim it dosn't, so none of the claims that hold in Wolkenmuekenheim, need hold anywhere else until proved without using WMytheology, which sort of proofs WM has yet to be able to produce successfully. --