In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 20:24:14 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > >Note that every finite ordered set is trivially well-ordered, and failure to > >be well ordered implies actual infiniteness, and WM's argument fails unless > >every set is actually finite, which is not the case > > Prove it by naming a natural number that does not belong to a FISON. Or prove > it by naming a rational number of an enumeration such that the index does not > belong to a FISON.
Since outside the wild weird world of WMytheology, neither of those is at all relevant to the well-ordering of a union or well-ordered finite sets, no one not incarcerated in WM's wild weird world of WMytheology need bother. --