On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 23:53:21 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:08 PM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote: >
> > My proof does not concern "the set of all natural numbers" whatever you may understand by and expect from that phrase. My proof concerns "all natural numbers" and "all rational numbers" without any exception. > > > > > > > > > > > > If your "sets" are different or more, then I am not interested in such matheological notions of magic power. > > > > > > > > > You are the one putting in "more" assumptions and restriction.
No. I consider only all rationals which should be possible if they all "are there", ... well somewhere.