Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: at the background of logic
Replies: 5   Last Post: Jun 13, 2013 7:52 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Peter Percival

Posts: 1,255
Registered: 10/25/10
Re: at the background of logic
Posted: Jun 13, 2013 7:52 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

William Elliot wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Zuhair wrote:
>

>> I think that all logical connectives, quantifiers and identity are
>> derivable from a simple semi-formal inference rule denoted by "|" to
>> represent "infers" and this is not to be confused with the Sheffer
>> stroke nor any known logical connective.
>>
>> A| C can be taken to mean the "negation of A"
>>
>> A,B| A can be taken to mean the "conjunction of A and B"

>
> Requires both that and A,B| B.
>

>> x| phi(x) can be taken to mean: for all x. phi(x)
>
> Confusion of propositions and objects.



How so?


--
I think I am an Elephant,
Behind another Elephant
Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there....
A.A. Milne



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.