On Friday, June 14, 2013 7:07:43 AM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote: > On Friday, 14 June 2013 10:11:40 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > > > > >>The Binary Tree > > > > > Please show what relationship you have in mind, between the complete binary tree and the rationals "written in the usual manner", as I cannot guess what you have in mind. > > > > In the usual way, you write the numbers separately. Example: In the list > > 0.1 > > 0.11 > > 0.111 > > ... > > you can look at every line, you will not find 1/9. > > If you write all numbers into the same line, like the nodes in a path of atree, you have, according to matheology, an infinite string of aleph_0 digits which can be abbreviated by 0.111... or 1/9. >
Writing all numbers one line, .111111..., is a Union. The "entire" first column is a Union. The "entire" diagonal is a Union.
You are a fool.
> > > > > 2) The triangle construcuted in 3-symmetry is equilateral. > > > > > It's rather you who keep claiming, contrary to all evidence, that, standardly, that symmetry is lost in the limit. > > > > No. > > > > The list given above does not contain aleph_0 1's in any direction. >