In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> On Friday, 14 June 2013 10:11:40 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > > >>The Binary Tree > > > Please show what relationship you have in mind, between the complete binary > > tree and the rationals "written in the usual manner", as I cannot guess > > what you have in mind. > > In the usual way, you write the numbers separately. Example: In the list > 0.1 > 0.11 > 0.111 > ... > you can look at every line, you will not find 1/9.
You can also look at every line of that list above and not find most of the binary rationals that should properly appear even in WM's supposed trees.
> If you write all numbers into the same line,
then you will not have a tree at all. > > > > > 2) The triangle construcuted in 3-symmetry is equilateral.
How does WM manage to have equilateral triangles each with one right angle and a couple of half-right angles in the finite case, and only one right angle and no other angles in the infinite case?? --