On Friday, 14 June 2013 20:39:08 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote: > On Friday, 14 June 2013 10:11:40 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > > >>The Binary Tree > > > Please show what relationship you have in mind, between the complete binary > > tree and the rationals "written in the usual manner", as I cannot guess > > what you have in mind. > > In the usual way, you write the numbers separately. Example: In the list > 0.1 > 0.11 > 0.111 > ... > you can look at every line, you will not find 1/9. You can also look at every line of that list above and not find most of the binary rationals that should properly appear even in WM's supposed trees.
The list above contains only one path of the tree, that one at the outmost right side.
2) The triangle construcuted in 3-symmetry is equilateral. How does WM manage to have equilateral triangles each with one right angle and a couple of half-right angles in the finite case, and only one right angle and no other angles in the infinite case??
Not at all. There is no infinite case.
c ac bbc
infinite means, it goes on and on without end or limit or limit case.