
Re: Mainstream Mathematics?
Posted:
Jun 15, 2013 3:05 PM


On Jun 15, 9:12 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > To refine to define the finite and nonfinite, or infinite and noninfinite, usually nonfinity is as shown with a set of ordinals that is Dedekindfinite or otherwise an unchanging amount of ordinals that is of to no limit ordinals, in infinite and transfinite ordinals. Defining infinity as change then noninfinity as dividing or divisible is so back to the noninfinite divides to itself, the infinite is only as to the related. > > So, counting or division could be read first in forward inference: for defining the nonfinite by the counted finite, or the infinite by the noninfinite divided continuum (here with the continuum as infinite). > > This is plainly constructible, in terms of that the infinite (ies) establish related rates of change as to the continuum. > > Then where the coordinates as it were are counted outward or to the origin, for the nilpotent and as in to partial products and transformation, they at once establish in one the other, in bounds then space.
To feed your appetite for fauxpostmodern gibberish,here is Jeanne Chervonna's "A MarxistJamesian Approach to the Axiom of Choice": https://bearspace.baylor.edu/Alexander_Pruss/www/HOAX.pdf

