On Saturday, 15 June 2013 22:22:30 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > I *never* leave the domain of finite sets (like Cantor never leaves it when enumerating something with finite naturals).
> Then WM's set of rationals must be a finite set, in contrast to everyone else's sets of rational
No. I never leave the finite domain, but I never come to an end. Therefore you cannot find a finite number larger than the cardinality of the set of rationals collected by my method. Cantor does exactly the same.