The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,111
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 291
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 11:06 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

<> wrote in message
On Monday, 17 June 2013 07:43:58 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
> In some systems consisting of ZFC + Some "Large Cardinal Axiom" CH, even
> GHC, can be proved or disproved. Perhaps Godel foresaw the >coming power
> of Inner Model Theory and Descriptive Set Theory.
>In some axiom systems it is possible to prove that the reals can be
>well-ordered, in other axiom-systems it is possible to prove that the reals

> >cannot be well-ordered. This shows that these "proofs" are nonsense, only
>pursued by matheologians. No science would rely on modern logic.
>The question is simply whether the reals can be well-ordered or not. But
>that question is not decided by matheology.
>How can some people remain that stupid to give a dime for a "proof" in
>matheology after Zermelo's desaster has become general knowledge?

> >>(Zermelo thought to prove that it can be done. Fraenkel wrote that
>*hitherto* nobody had accomplished it.) Menawhile the value of modern logic
> >should be obvious to everybody.
>Regards, WM

you so silly, the first axiom is " I always lie "

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.