Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,773
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 291
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 2:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Monday, June 17, 2013 5:23:11 AM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
> On Monday, 17 June 2013 07:43:58 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>

> > > In some systems consisting of ZFC + Some "Large Cardinal Axiom" CH, even GHC, can be proved or disproved. Perhaps Godel foresaw the coming power of Inner Model Theory and Descriptive Set Theory.
>
>
>

>> In some axiom systems it is possible to prove that the reals can be well-ordered, in other axiom-systems it is possible to prove that the reals cannot be well-ordered. This shows that these "proofs" are nonsense, only pursued by matheologians. No science would rely on modern logic.
>
> Why are you talking about the well-ordering of the reals?


Because it is the most famous example. It can be "proved" in ZFC, it can be disproved in Mathematics. And it cannot be done in reality.

> I thought this was about the Continuum Hypothesis?

The same mess. But less known.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.