Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 291
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 5:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <1fb33c0c-eba7-4e05-b990-aca1de659f0c@googlegroups.com>,
Zeit Geist <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote:

> > > Why are you talking about the well-ordering of the reals?

> >
> > Because it is the most famous example. It can be "proved" in ZFC


But not in ZF. Which is why many mathematicians and logicians are a bit
cautious with C.

But in WMytheology, WM continually claims that limits of strictly
increasing sequences are members of the sequence, which can NOT happen
in either ZF or ZFC.

Given that, any sensible person will prefer ZF to WMytheology, and even
ZFC to WMytheology.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.