On Monday, June 17, 2013 3:33:33 PM UTC-4:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Google new format does not allow me to reply-post to the same > > newsgroups I started with, so then that means my replies are new > > replies.
Good. Go kill yourself you complete waste of a fucking life.
Your replies are verbal diarrhea; they are useless, just like
_everything_ you do, you sorry fuck. > > > > Previously in #1608, I wrote: > > > So that when we > > > find a sample of U238 with half life of 4.5 billion years and find > > > half the sample is U238 and the other half is lead, we jump to the > > > false conclusion of 4.5 billion years old, whereas in fact, it was > > > likely to be 6 billion years old since some of the lead turned into > > > U238 and some of the thallium and mercury turned into lead. > > > > Now that is a gross error on my part for what I should have said is > > that if a sample of half U238 and half lead is found, does not imply > > 4.5 billion years when Dirac's New Radioactivities is factored in. > > More than likely, when such a sample is found, the age is at least 10 > > billion years old. > > > > In Old Physics and Old Astronomy and Old Geology, they had radioactive > > decay, but they never had radioactive growth due to Dirac's new > > radioactivities. > > > > Now we are beginning to see cosmology ages from gamma ray > > spectroscopy, and finding that some of the nearby stars to the Sun are > > 12 to 13 billion years old. And even yet, those estimates do not > > factor in Dirac's new radioactivities which would make those old stars > > even older to perhaps 15 to 20 billion years old. The Milky Way galaxy > > is likely to have an age of 20 billion years old. Our Sun is probably > > 10 billion years old and Jupiter is probably 5 billion years old. > > > > Physicists have worked out the pathways of radioactive decay, but they > > need to start working out the pathway of radioactive growth, starting > > with hydrogen, and how it builds the rest of the elements. One > > interesting pathway is why radioactive growth favors heavy water for > > comets while it favors regular water for Earth. > > > > > > -- > > > > More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google > > newsgroups author search archive from May 2012 to May 2013. Drexel > > University's Math Forum has done a far better job and many of those > > missing Google posts can be seen here: > > > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 > > > > Archimedes Plutonium > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > > where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies