The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 291
Posted: Jun 18, 2013 3:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Monday, 17 June 2013 21:46:17 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> > > This shows that these "proofs" are nonsense

> > It only proves that different sets of assumptions lead to different
> > conclusions,

> In this case the question is whether the reals can be well-ordered - and
> absolutely nothing else! A theory that says yes and no does not contribute
> soemthing of value.

But a theory, like the wild weird theory of WMytheology, that says it IS
well ordered in its usual order, contributes chaos.
> Look, when I ask what is 5 + 5? You may answer

Or I may not. Since if WM has to ask, there is not much point in

For the standard naturals, or integers, or rationals, or reals, of
complexes, or even quaternions, 5 + 5 is 10. It is only in areas like
modular arithmetic or WMYTHEOLOGY that it may be something else.

The only empty set that has a right to be considered is the success of
WM's set theory.
> Descartes once claimed that the only vacuum existing in the universe, was the
> brain of Pascal. With respect to modern set theorists, he might have even
> found some better sites.

Since WM does not appear to have a mind at all, vacuum may be the only
occupant of WM's skull.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.