Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 291
Posted: Jun 18, 2013 4:47 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <5ddc352e-23b7-432d-9857-8cb73f76b6e3@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:23:26 UTC+2, FredJeffries wrote:
> > Perhaps that is nothing of value to an ivory tower type, but to those of us
> > who actually work for a living, knowing the right tool to use at the right
> > time is extremely valuable.

>
> No. Whatever tool you use, you cannot well-order the reals. Therefore your
> counterfactual tool is not valuable the least.


If WM choses to eliminate all reference to the reals from his
mathematical world, he will make it even more barren than it is now.

It may well be that one can prove, in some particular system, that it
is possible to do something without actually producing any particular
way of doing it.

That does not invalidate the system.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.