On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:47:05 PM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote: > On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 22:18:45 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > > > > Your regurgitation is not simply general, it altogether misses the point. > > > > > Sorry, what was the point? > > > > If you start counting from 1, you cannot have X numbers without a number X in the ordinals. >
I see you wrote:
"No. Nothing works because w is the number of finite naturals, i.e., the number of digits of 0.111... There is no digit number w. But without a digit number X you cannot have X digits."
w is not a "digit number", and it need not be for it to be an Ordinal, or for its Cardinality to be aleph_0. Your last statement is false.