Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,737
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 291
Posted: Jun 19, 2013 9:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 18 Jun., 22:45, Zeit Geist <tucsond...@me.com> wrote:

>
> It contradicts the results of common arithmetic, but this does not
> make it "false".
> It is still consistent and has actual real-world applications.


An uncountable set cannot be well-ordered in any theory.
Therefore a theory which "proves" that it can be well-ordered is
false. That is completely independent of game theory or analysis. It
is an absolute proof - independent of any axioms.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.