The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 291
Posted: Jun 19, 2013 9:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 18 Jun., 22:45, Zeit Geist <> wrote:

> It contradicts the results of common arithmetic, but this does not
> make it "false".
> It is still consistent and has actual real-world applications.

An uncountable set cannot be well-ordered in any theory.
Therefore a theory which "proves" that it can be well-ordered is
false. That is completely independent of game theory or analysis. It
is an absolute proof - independent of any axioms.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.