In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 19 Jun., 18:48, Zeit Geist <tucsond...@me.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:15:28 AM UTC-7, WM wrote: > > > > > An uncountable set cannot be well-ordered in any theory. > > > > > Therefore a theory which "proves" that it can be well-ordered is > > > > > false. That is completely independent of game theory or analysis. It > > > > > is an absolute proof - independent of any axioms. > > > > Now you speak like a religious zealot with your "absolute". > > It is just fact like the impossibility to get 33 in roulette or > contracting power between masses.
If WM plays roulette someplace with no 33 on the wheel, he is almost certainly being cheated, but is too ignorant to notice.. --