Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 291
Replies: 28   Last Post: Jun 19, 2013 5:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: WMytheology � 291
Posted: Jun 19, 2013 5:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<2aa815df-cae6-43f4-95e1-f44b6e4cac93@ce7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Jun., 18:48, Zeit Geist <tucsond...@me.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:15:28 AM UTC-7, WM wrote:
> >

> > > An uncountable set cannot be well-ordered in any theory.
> >
> > > Therefore a theory which "proves" that it can be well-ordered is
> >
> > > false. That is completely independent of game theory or analysis. It
> >
> > > is an absolute proof - independent of any axioms.
> >
> > Now you speak like a religious zealot with your "absolute".

>
> It is just fact like the impossibility to get 33 in roulette or
> contracting power between masses.


If WM plays roulette someplace with no 33 on the wheel, he is almost
certainly being cheated, but is too ignorant to notice..
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.