"WM" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > On 20 Jun., 19:46, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: >> "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message >> news:firstname.lastname@example.org... >> > On 20 Jun., 15:33, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: >> >> >> >> (E.g. did anybody study the latter construction [the L=[0,L]]? Does >> >> the "issue" exists at all, >> >> > This issue does not exist in any forum or journal where matheologians >> > are the dominating fraction. >> >> If that distinction has any merit, then it's hard to believe that nobody >> has >> looked into it yet. Anyway, if that is so, this "issue" might very well >> become the basis for my PhD thesis... so to speak. > > I would not recommend that. First, I have been publishing this > observation in many places for about 10 years now.
I have never seen in years you post or publish a single decent mathematical argument that is one, so you do not count.