Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Re: WMytheology § 293
Replies: 10   Last Post: Jun 30, 2013 4:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
FredJeffries@gmail.com

Posts: 877
Registered: 11/29/07
Re: WMytheology § 293
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 2:25 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jun 20, 11:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 20 Jun., 19:34, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com>
>

> > Speaking of taking the union of a sequence is gibberish. Treating a
> > sequence of sets as a set of sets is the work of a chowderhead, a
> > clown
> > or a charlatan.

>
> Isn't a sequence of X an ordered set of X without repetitions? In
> particular an inclusion monotonic strictly increasing sequence is an
> ordered set.
>
> Regards, WM


No. A sequence is a function with domain the natural numbers.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.