In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 20 Jun., 19:46, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > > "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message > > > > news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > > > > > On 20 Jun., 15:33, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > > >> (E.g. did anybody study the latter construction [the L=[0,L]]? Does > > >> the "issue" exists at all, > > > > > This issue does not exist in any forum or journal where matheologians > > > are the dominating fraction. > > > > If that distinction has any merit, then it's hard to believe that nobody has > > looked into it yet. Anyway, if that is so, this "issue" might very well > > become the basis for my PhD thesis... so to speak. > > I would not recommend that. First, I have been publishing this > observation in many places for about 10 years now.
That you have been publishing it for so long with such negative results would send a message to a brighter poster.
Your posts to that effect, WM, are of use only as amusements to vast majority less monomaniacal that yourself. --