Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 288
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jun 22, 2013 12:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,201
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 288
Posted: Jun 21, 2013 8:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote in message
news:kpunob$l93$1@dont-email.me...
> "Alan Smaill" <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:fwehagtm58s.fsf@eriboll.inf.ed.ac.uk...

>> "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
>>> "fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message
>>> news:C6KdnZCccIjltVzMnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>

>>>> "Numbers count themselves"
>>>
>>> Indeed, how else?

>>
>> What does pi count?
>> Isn't it a number?

>
> pi counts pi, of course...


<< Edward Nelson criticizes the classical conception of natural numbers
because of the circularity of its definition. In classical mathematics the
natural numbers are defined as 0 and numbers obtained by the iterative
applications of the successor function to 0. But the concept of natural
number is already assumed for the iteration. >>

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrafinitism#Main_ideas>

Julio





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.