The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 288
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jun 22, 2013 12:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 4,165
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 288
Posted: Jun 21, 2013 8:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Julio Di Egidio" <> wrote in message
> "Alan Smaill" <> wrote in message

>> "Julio Di Egidio" <> writes:
>>> "fom" <> wrote in message

>>>> "Numbers count themselves"
>>> Indeed, how else?

>> What does pi count?
>> Isn't it a number?

> pi counts pi, of course...

<< Edward Nelson criticizes the classical conception of natural numbers
because of the circularity of its definition. In classical mathematics the
natural numbers are defined as 0 and numbers obtained by the iterative
applications of the successor function to 0. But the concept of natural
number is already assumed for the iteration. >>



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.