The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 288
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jun 22, 2013 12:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 4,165
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 288
Posted: Jun 21, 2013 9:23 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Sam Sung" <no@mail.invalid> wrote in message
> Julio Di Egidio wrote:

>> << Edward Nelson criticizes the classical conception of natural numbers
>> because of the circularity of its definition. In classical mathematics
>> the
>> natural numbers are defined as 0 and numbers obtained by the iterative
>> applications of the successor function to 0. But the concept of natural
>> number is already assumed for the iteration. >>
>> <>

> So what?

You have snipped the context.

> Take any (uniquely operated) iteration and count the
> steps by whichever method you like - the result is isomorphic
> to N in whichever 'theory'.

No, confront strict finitism.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.