The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 288
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jun 22, 2013 12:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 288
Posted: Jun 22, 2013 12:03 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 6/21/2013 10:00 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "fom" <> wrote in message


>> I do not disagree that the naming of numbers
>> has a correspondence with the count of names.
>> But, because of Cantor's insights and investigations
>> of infinity, ordinality and cardinality are not
>> taken to be the same thing.

> I think that's beside the point. Anyway, those results do not
> (necessarily) hold in a non-standard setting.

Well, when Hilbert shifts from formal axiomatics
to finitistic proof theory, he begins with a
"strokes-as-numerals" intuition of natural number


He then goes on to make the general argument for
cardinalities based upon the symmetric groups.

What non-standard setting conflates ordinality
and cardinality?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.