In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Saturday, 22 June 2013 23:08:14 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > > On Saturday, June 22, 2013 12:34:12 PM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh- > > > What about the statement, "In a plane, given a line, l, and a point, p, > > such that p is not on l; then there exists exactly one line, k, such that k > > is parallel to l and p is on k. Is that a true statement? > > Of course, if the plane is a plane.
So does WM's claim that a plane need not be a plane?
The mathematics OUTSIDE of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, requires that a limit of a STRICTLY increasing endless sequence, CANNOT be a member of that sequence.
But INSIDE of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology WM insists that the limit of a strictly increasing endless sequence of FISONs , if it is to exist at all, MUST be a member of the sequence, i.e., be a FISON.
Thus in WM's WMytheology there must be an end, or largest member for any set of sequence of FISONs. Thus WM requires the existence of a natural number which has no successor natural, and this does not happen anywhere outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology. --