On 6/23/2013 5:26 AM, email@example.com wrote: > On Saturday, 22 June 2013 19:18:04 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: >> Challenge to WM: Since WM claims the the union of all FISONs does not contain all naturals, he is also claiming the existence of a natural not in any FISON, so we challenge him to name any such natural. > > I have no access to inaccessible numbers. But I see that every number that you have access to has a finite number of predecessors and an infinite number of successors. That means you have access to less than 50 % of all numbers. > > Regards, WM >
you probably mean
One of the reasons that my posts are so awkward is that I make the attempt to have my language conform to the views I express. You confuse matters by not doing so.