Ok, so I think I see what you are complaining about. My statement that the function was ever increasing and would only intersect at one point. It could also intersect at two points. I was focused on the behavior after P and really didn't need to go that far. Just use what I wrote in the posts regarding log(x) v x.
On Jun 23, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Robert Hansen <email@example.com> wrote:
> Well, it was meant to be an intuitive proof. Maybe you are trying to read too much into it. > > Do you see that log(x) increases more slowly than x when x > 1? > > Think about this... > > How fast would the "x" in log(x) have to increase in order for y = log(x) to keep up with y = x? > > It would have to increase like "e^x". Does e^x increase faster than x? > > Bob Hansen > > On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Joe Niederberger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote > > >> R Hansen says: >>> Maybe this will help... >> >> Oooh! - I should think correcting your >> logic would help. Do you want me to spell it out? >> >> Cheers, >> Joe N