The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 295
Replies: 8   Last Post: Jun 28, 2013 4:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 295
Posted: Jun 27, 2013 2:29 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:37:17 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:

> > You can't build the infinite from a finite set of finite things.
> Of course I can, and many have done it before. The sequence 1, 2, 3, ... is
> infinite by induction.

But that ",,," makes it not a finite set of finite things.
> > AoI accomplishes the construction of an Infinite set. And yes, "Oh, oh,
> > it's magic"

> No. The magic only came into play when a "cardinal number" was attached to
> that set. aleph_0 is not derived from any axiom.

Without an axiom of infinity in ZF, there is no provable |N or provable
aleph_0, but with that axiom, in ZF one gets both.
> Here an unreasonable limit

It is purely WM's unreason that is at issue here.

And he has a superabundance of it.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.