Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 295
Replies: 8   Last Post: Jun 28, 2013 4:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,238
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 295
Posted: Jun 28, 2013 4:46 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Thursday, 27 June 2013 20:29:51 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> Without an axiom of infinity in ZF, there is no provable |N or provable aleph_0, but with that axiom, in ZF one gets both.

No, one gets what we had for millenia: natural numbers such that everybody could count as far as he could. "A set" is not defined by any axiom because there is no definition of set. aleph_0 is about the same delusion in matheology as is the devil in religions.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.