
Re: Matheology § 295
Posted:
Jun 28, 2013 4:46 AM


On Thursday, 27 June 2013 20:29:51 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > Without an axiom of infinity in ZF, there is no provable N or provable aleph_0, but with that axiom, in ZF one gets both.
No, one gets what we had for millenia: natural numbers such that everybody could count as far as he could. "A set" is not defined by any axiom because there is no definition of set. aleph_0 is about the same delusion in matheology as is the devil in religions.
Regards, WM

