The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 295
Replies: 24   Last Post: Jun 30, 2013 3:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 295
Posted: Jun 28, 2013 5:57 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Friday, 28 June 2013 03:39:04 UTC+2, fom wrote:
> I have written formal axioms. I have thought through the difference between Cantor and Frege (by the way, a Cantorian "theory of ones" is not a "strokes-as-numerals" representation of number) I have thought through Zermelo's discussion of partition lattices in relation to the axiom of choice and the distinguished elements dictated by its use ... And the list goes on.

I am very sorry for you (really, this is *not* malice) that you have invested so much time in plain nonsense. Unfortunately there are many like you. It is a shame that that could happen

> You choose to be ignorant of what is original in my work.

As far as I have understood, your work builds on nonsense. Therefore I do not wish to invest time to learn it, in particular since you write very long texts.

> "Society" rewards men like you, Herr Doktor.

No. Society, at least at present, rewards matheologians.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.