Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 295
Replies: 24   Last Post: Jun 30, 2013 3:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 295
Posted: Jun 29, 2013 12:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <54ydnTUqr5AM0lPMnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 6/28/2013 5:12 AM, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
> > On Friday, 28 June 2013 11:48:16 UTC+2, fom wrote:
> > Cantor constructed, without any axioms
> >

> Of course.
> My apologies.

Actually, Cantor did make assumptions, he just didn't call them axioms.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.