
Re: Joel David Hamkins on definable real numbers in analysis
Posted:
Jun 29, 2013 5:47 AM


On Saturday, 29 June 2013 00:02:00 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
>> Every F(n) is in some line. More cannot be consolidated.
> According to your own analysis, they can further be consolidated into ONE AND THE SAME line.
When applying matheology.
> Which members of N does WM claim are NOT members of any FISON, thus many FISONs, thus the union of all FISONs?
The infinitely many F(n) that have n larger than any n ever used by the creatures of the creation of HIM (the "Infinitum aeternum increatum sive Absolutum" that all matheologians must believe in, if there are all natural numbers, the "Infinitum creatum sive Transfinitum" as having been created by him)
> > > "Each child is on some bus" does not, necessarily, imply that "All children > > are on some bus". > > Here we have a different situation: Each child is in one bus together with > all smaller children. Try to figure out how many buses are required > respectively possible.
That means that, at least in WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, some children must be simultaneously on more than one bus.
No, there is only one bus. If the case of FISONs should be simulated, then there must be as many avatars as necessary such that every child is with all its smaller companions in the same bus. In no case you can find two or more children that are not in one bus.
Regards, WM

